Am I losing the other inventions if I pick one?
Not permanently. The claims you do not elect are withdrawn from this application, not abandoned as subject matter. They can be pursued in a divisional application filed while this one is still pending.
What you should not do is elect silently. Electing with traverse keeps your objection on the record, which matters if you later want the requirement reviewed or want the benefit of the safe harbour against double patenting.
What the reply has to do
- Identify the group you elect for examination, by group number as the examiner labelled them.
- State whether the election is made with or without traverse. With traverse preserves your right to contest the requirement.
- If traversing, explain why the groups are not independent and distinct, or why searching them together would not be a serious burden.
- Respond to any species election the examiner also required within the elected group.
- File within the reply period — usually two months from the mailing date, extendable for a fee within the six-month statutory limit.
Why the period is two months, not three
A requirement that only asks you to elect does not reject anything on the merits, and the USPTO sets a shorter period for it. If your document is a restriction requirement with no rejections in it, do not assume you have three months.
The cost consequence people miss
A restriction requirement usually means that fully protecting what you filed will cost more than one application. That is a budgeting question as much as a legal one, and it is worth answering deliberately: which group has the most commercial value, whether a divisional is planned, and when it has to be filed to stay entitled to the earlier date.
35 U.S.C. 121; 37 C.F.R. 1.142
37 C.F.R. 1.143
Two months from the mailing date
Available in a divisional filed while the parent is pending
MPEP 800 series